Last quarter Moody's Rating Service raised the credit rating of 150 banks using a new criteria based on countries likely to provide a bailout in a banking crisis. This is a far cry from rating the credit worthiness based on a banks balance sheet and ability to service debt. After being questioned on the revisions by Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan Chase, Moody's has now decided to reverse the decision to use bailout possibilities for their ratings.
According to Moody's, some banks will have their ratings lowered by two to three grades based on the revisions. This creates a problem for Moody's as they will have lost confidence in the banks they are downgrading and adding to the confidence lost when they revised the ratings in the first place. This has reflected in Moody's stock price giving up over 11% since the beginning of the year.
In an
article from Bloomberg, Tom Jenkins, a senior credit research analyst at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc in London, said in an interview
"A lot of banks have been very upset, and it's going to take time to repair the bridge"
"I don't think this turnaround will necessarily be the magic pill"
And Merrill analyst Richard Thomas in London critized the ratings as
"perverse" the revision gave three Icelandic banks the same top Aaa ratings as the U.S. Treasury and Exxon Mobil Corp.
Moody's will be listing the banks and their credit rating changes later this evening.
Already in question is Moody's and S&P credit ratings on some bonds containing poor performing subprime mortgages and carrying a high bond rating. Could this be the turning point for credit risk awareness and the confidence in credit ratings?